Source: No source document in the corpus yet.
Layer: appropriation — Layer one: what Quorum Court (11 justices of the peace) authorized to be spent. What was actually spent is layer two (audit and treasurer reports); which vendor got which check is layer three (check register).
Checked: Not independently checkable yet — no complete set of sub-lines exists in the corpus to sum against.
Docket: Issue #8 — Legislative audit reports & treasurer's reports (in progress)

Note on this line

Highway turnback, court fees and fines, automation fees, and grant revenue are implied by the fund names but not itemized in the ordinance. Treasurer's reports and the legislative audit carry this detail.

how this line is traced

Reconstructed — and the trail stops here. To see who this money actually reached, someone has to pull records, minutes, or a check register (that's Docket #8). It often stays dark.

There's another way. If the county paid this line from a transparent, line-attributed account, it would publish its own itemized transactions — payee, amount, date — the moment each payment cleared. No request required; the dead end becomes a list. That's the idea behind receipts by rails, filed as a solution to the transparency question — read it and weigh in.