Source: No source document in the corpus yet.
Layer: appropriation — Layer one: what Quorum Court (11 justices of the peace) authorized to be spent. What was actually spent is layer two (audit and treasurer reports); which vendor got which check is layer three (check register).
Checked: Not independently checkable yet — no complete set of sub-lines exists in the corpus to sum against.
Docket: Issue #3 — Millage rate sheet & sales tax inventory (in progress)

Note on this line

At least two dedicated sales taxes are visible from the spending side (EDCCC economic development; Various Fire Departments fund). Rates, sunset dates, and enacting ordinances not yet ingested. This got more urgent in July 2026: local reporting says the county owes the state roughly $1.3 million in sales-tax rebate repayments — a news lead, not yet a document in this corpus. The enacting ordinances live in the county's online ordinance archive (Docket #9).

how this line is traced

Reconstructed — and the trail stops here. To see who this money actually reached, someone has to pull records, minutes, or a check register (that's Docket #3). It often stays dark.

There's another way. If the county paid this line from a transparent, line-attributed account, it would publish its own itemized transactions — payee, amount, date — the moment each payment cleared. No request required; the dead end becomes a list. That's the idea behind receipts by rails, filed as a solution to the transparency question — read it and weigh in.