🗺 Every page — the whole flow
Should Clark County back growing and sharing food together as public infrastructure — gardens on public land, a gleaning and produce-sharing network, and school and campus gardens — the way it backs parks, the library, and water?
Local · Clark County — advisory signal to your county — Quorum Court (11 justices of the peace), a city board, or the school board.
Your answer — fifteen seconds, no account, nothing asked Rules of engagement
Tap an answer. No account, nothing asked — change it anytime while your window is open.
The count so far — aggregate only, always
| Answer | Count |
|---|---|
| Yes | 1 |
| No | 0 |
| Skip | 0 |
1 total · all Tier 0 (open sentiment) · all via web · updates instantly
Who's answering, self-reported (not verified): 0 live in Clark County · 0 work here · 0 have family here · 1 other or unsaid
Every answer moves this bar in real time — including yours. At 400, the result is printed and hand-delivered.
Tier 0 means open sentiment: it shows how visitors lean, and it is never cited as verified resident opinion. Phone, residency, and voter verification tiers arrive with the full voting layer — and results will always display every tier's count separately.
These counts are unofficial: gathered by an independent community platform, not by any government. This is not an election, a referendum, or a legal petition — its only weight is that the counting is published and checkable.
Plainly: because a Tier 0 answer takes no verification, a determined person can pad this number — that is exactly the weakness the verification tiers (phone, residency, voter-file) are built to close. Until then, treat these as open sentiment, never proof, and weigh the public signatures — real names, by choice — more heavily than the raw count.
Proposed solutions — cited, and voted yes or no
This is where the question turns into proposals. Anyone can file a clear, concise solution moving forward — backed by documents, research, or a worked-out idea, with its sources. Everyone else clicks yes or no. No comment threads: ideas rise on their sources and their count, not on who argues loudest.
Clark County and its cities hold vacant parcels. Offer them for community gardens through a simple, revocable license — the model Newark runs at $1 a year and Baltimore runs for free — so no land is ever sold or given away. This is a proven public service, not an experiment: Seattle has run 91 community gardens through a city department since 1973 (its gardeners donated 40,000 pounds of produce to meal programs in 2023), and Brown County, Wisconsin has run 13 gardens and 386 plots through its Extension office, the county, and the city since 1996. The know-how is already here and free — every Arkansas county has a Cooperative Extension office and the Master Gardener program behind it. Honest limit: land is necessary but not sufficient. Gardens need water, soil, and stewards, and a plot supplements a household’s groceries (a California study estimates about $435 of produce a season), it does not end anyone’s food insecurity.
→ Read the full brief, with every precedent and the honest limits.
Do not build gleaning from scratch — it already runs statewide. The Arkansas Gleaning Project (the Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance with the Society of St. Andrew) has gleaned more than 12 million pounds of fresh produce and works with 800-plus hunger-relief organizations across all 75 counties. The county’s job is connection: route surplus from gardens, farms, and the farmers market into that network, and set up a community fridge or produce-sharing point for daily give-and-take. Nearly free — the logistics already exist. Honest limit: community fridges are citizen-led mutual aid, not a government program (the national Freedge network counted 150-plus US fridges in 2021). A county can host or tolerate one, but volunteers keep it running, not staff.
Clark County has assets most rural counties do not: a school district and two universities, Henderson State and Ouachita Baptist. School gardens feed cafeterias and teach kids where food comes from — Denver’s Garden to Cafeteria program put more than 5,000 pounds of school-grown produce into salad bars at about 250 schools. This is not untested here: in 2011 USDA’s People’s Garden School Pilot partnered with the University of Arkansas to build school gardens through Cooperative Extension. The evidence is real but honest about itself — the best systematic review links community gardening to higher fruit-and-vegetable intake while stating plainly that the overall evidence quality is low. We keep that caveat attached rather than oversell it.
A food policy council is a lightweight body a local government can create by resolution to coordinate the people already working on food — growers, schools, the food bank, the universities, and the county itself. Johns Hopkins’ Center for a Livable Future documents that these can be housed directly in government, and at least 283 were active across the US as of 2020. It is the cheap, structural piece that keeps gardens, gleaning, and school plots from staying one-off projects. The north star — honestly out of a county’s scale, but showing the direction: Belo Horizonte runs a coordinated food-as-a-right system at about 2% of its city budget, and Rosario turned vacant land into 2,500 tons of food a year (a WRI Prize for Cities winner). Both are the work of a standing municipal food body, not a single grant.
The hard truth about gardens, fridges, and gleaning is that they only ever cost money — so they live and die on grants and volunteers. The fix is an economic engine underneath them: a food hub (aggregation, cold storage, light processing, delivery) that SELLS local food at market rate to buyers who already pay — the hospital, the school district, the universities, large employers — and routes its seconds and surplus to the pantries. The selling arm funds the giving arm; grants buy one-time capital (a building, a cooler, a truck), not payroll. It is proven infrastructure, not a hope: 91% of US food hubs broke even or better in 2020, institutions spend $130 billion a year on food, and Arkansas’s Medicaid nutrition waiver now opens produce prescriptions as a health-care buyer. Honest limit: food hubs still lean on grants (2025 data) and need a real business operator and three to five years to turn — this is the slow flywheel, not a quick win. The full cited design is at /engine.
→ Read the full brief, with every precedent and the honest limits.
This does not have to come out of the general fund. USDA’s Community Food Projects Competitive Grants Program funds exactly this kind of work — up to $400,000, with a 1-to-1 match — and is open to nonprofits and gleaning groups (a local food nonprofit or the food bank applies, since a county government is not directly eligible for the core track). Extension support is already free to every county. Spend this money the durable way — on one-time capital and startup (land prep, a cooler, a truck, first-year coordination that hands off to earned revenue), not on payroll that ends when the grant does (see the engine at /engine). Honest limits: these grants are competitive, time-limited, and need a nonprofit applicant and a match — they are seed money to get a program self-sustaining, not a permanent funding line. The point is that the county’s own cost can be land, coordination, and political will, not a new tax.
File a solution — clear, concise, cited
Filed solutions are public and screened against the bright lines. Your name isn't attached — it stands on its sources.
Make it count for more — optional, always
Your answer is already counted, anonymously. If you want it to weigh more, tell us who's answering — and, if you like, put your name on it like a petition. All optional.
Answer the question above first — then this opens up.
Put your name on it — optional, petition-style
A registered answer is the kind an official can't wave off. Every field is optional — leave what you like.
The only use of this information, in full: it stays in a private file on our server, separate from the votes, and is never published anywhere — with one exception that is always yours to choose: the announce box puts your name, town, and answer on the question page, until you uncheck it. The one other use — the reason registration exists — is to let a count be verified as real people the way a petition's signatures can be checked: if an official questions whether a result is genuine, we can confirm the registrations behind it are real, and only that. Never sold, never handed to anyone for any other purpose, never used for marketing. Remove yours any time: brayden.ozark@gmail.com.
Signed publicly — the loud version: optional, always
The count above is anonymous and stays that way. Signing is the separate, louder act — your name and your answer, on the page, like a petition on a counter. Answer the question first, then sign it if you want to be heard by name.
Jonathin Shuffield, Arkadelphia — YES 2026-09-12
Signatures are self-given and unverified until the verification tiers arrive. If a signature misuses your name, email brayden.ozark@gmail.com and we will remove it — removals are logged on the public record like everything else.
Share it — a question travels farther than a website
Send a neighbor straight to this question — they land right here, answer in fifteen seconds, done. Text it, post it, print the code for the counter or the church bulletin.
During early access: the site asks for a door code — send it along with the link (you know it if you're reading this). When they enter it, the door opens onto this exact page.
The traction rule: at 400 responses, the result gets printed and hand-delivered to the relevant body, and the delivery is stamped on the docket. 1 of 400 and counting — every share moves it.
The context — why this question exists
About one in five people in Clark County are food insecure — a 20% rate in the 2023 Feeding America Map the Meal Gap estimate, above Arkansas’s 19% and the nation’s 14% (source). Most food help is emergency help, and that work is essential — nothing here replaces it. This question asks about a second, cheaper, more durable thing: whether the county should back growing and sharing food together as public infrastructure, using land, know-how, and grant money it largely already has — a Cooperative Extension office in every county, a statewide gleaning network in all 75 counties, and two universities in town. The full research, with precedents and honest limits, is in Food as a utility.
Disclosures — the platform holds itself to its own standard
This question was opened by the platform’s founder. Unlike the contract-transparency question, no sponsor relationship is at stake here; it is disclosed only because the platform names who opens every question.
Bright lines that apply to every question here: no votes on races or on live ballot measures, no campaign language, and nothing aimed at non-elected staff. Elected officials can be named. The raw submission and any wording history are logged in the platform's public repository.